The climate con

Even after all the exposed emails and science that has been proven to be junk the UN is still trying to perpetrate this massive fraud on the planet. Do you know why?

MONEY – they plan on extorting more and more money from developed countries.

Advertisements

24 Comments (+add yours?)

  1. Kim
    Dec 09, 2011 @ 15:33:29

    Exclusive: UN Climate Draft Text Demands ‘New International Climate Court’ to compel reparations for ‘climate debt’ — Also seeks ‘rights of Mother Earth’ & 2C° drop in global temps

    http://www.climatedepot.com/a/14072/Exclusive-UN-Climate-Draft-Text-Demands-New-International-Climate-Court-to-compel-reparations-for-climate-debt–Also-seeks-rights-of-Mother-Earth–2Cdeg-drop-in-global-temps

    Reply

  2. Kim
    Dec 09, 2011 @ 15:33:46

    A new International Climate Court will have the power to compel Western nations to pay ever-larger sums to third-world countries in the name of making reparation for supposed “climate debt”. The Court will have no power over third-world countries. Here and throughout the draft, the West is the sole target. “The process” is now irredeemably anti-Western

    Reply

  3. Kim
    Dec 09, 2011 @ 15:33:59

    “Rights of Mother Earth”: The draft, which seems to have been written by feeble-minded green activists and environmental extremists, talks of “The recognition and defence of the rights of Mother Earth to ensure harmony between humanity and nature”. Also, “there will be no commodification [whatever that may be: it is not in the dictionary and does not deserve to be] of the functions of nature, therefore no carbon market will be developed with that purpose”

    Reply

  4. Kim
    Dec 09, 2011 @ 15:34:11

    “Right to survive”: The draft childishly asserts that “The rights of some Parties to survive are threatened by the adverse impacts of climate change, including sea level rise.” At 2 inches per century, according to eight years’ data from the Envisat satellite? Oh, come off it! The Jason 2 satellite, the new kid on the block, shows that sea-level has actually dropped over the past three years

    Reply

  5. Kim
    Dec 09, 2011 @ 15:35:48

    War and the maintenance of defense forces and equipment are to cease – just like that – because they contribute to climate change. There are other reasons why war ought to cease, but the draft does not mention them.

    Reply

  6. Kim
    Dec 09, 2011 @ 15:36:05

    A new global temperature target will aim, Canute-like, to limit “global warming” to as little as 1 C° above pre-industrial levels. Since temperature is already 3 C° above those levels, what is in effect being proposed is a 2 C° cut in today’s temperatures. This would take us halfway back towards the last Ice Age, and would kill hundreds of millions. Colder is far more dangerous than warmer.

    Reply

  7. Kim
    Dec 09, 2011 @ 15:36:20

    The new CO2 emissions target, for Western countries only, will be a reduction of up to 50% in emissions over the next eight years and of “more than 100%” [these words actually appear in the text] by 2050. So, no motor cars, no coal-fired or gas-fired power stations, no aircraft, no trains. Back to the Stone Age, but without even the right to light a carbon-emitting fire in your caves. Windmills, solar panels and other “renewables” are the only alternatives suggested in the draft. There is no mention of the immediate and rapid expansion of nuclear power worldwide to prevent near-total economic destruction.

    Reply

  8. Kim
    Dec 09, 2011 @ 15:36:36

    The new CO2 concentration target could be as low as 300 ppmv CO2 equivalent (i.e., including all other greenhouse gases as well as CO2 itself). That is a cut of almost half compared with the 560 ppmv CO2 equivalent today. It implies just 210 ppmv of CO2 itself, with 90 ppmv CO2 equivalent from other greenhouse gases. But at 210 ppmv, plants and trees begin to die. CO2 is plant food. They need a lot more of it than 210 ppmv.

    Reply

  9. Kim
    Dec 09, 2011 @ 15:36:53

    The peak-greenhouse-gas target year – for the West only – will be this year. We will be obliged to cut our emissions from now on, regardless of the effect on our economies (and the lack of effect on the climate)

    Reply

  10. Kim
    Dec 09, 2011 @ 15:37:07

    The West will pay for everything, because of its “historical responsibility” for causing “global warming”. Third-world countries will not be obliged to pay anything. But it is the UN, not the third-world countries, that will get the money from the West, taking nearly all of it for itself as usual. There is no provision anywhere in the draft for the UN to publish accounts of how it has spent the $100 billion a year the draft demands that the West should stump up from now on.

    Reply

  11. Kim
    Dec 09, 2011 @ 15:38:55

    Reply

  12. Sherry
    Dec 09, 2011 @ 20:28:31

    Here’s the thing. Its all about disarming the West. Neutering them. Once they are near lifeless they can not hinder the One World Religion and the One World Government and the One World Currency. New World Order, here it comes!

    Reply

    • Kim
      Dec 09, 2011 @ 20:33:05

      We the People inflict terror in all uneducated low living countries
      We the People refuse subjugation and tyranny
      We the People

      Reply

  13. Sherry
    Dec 09, 2011 @ 20:28:46

    Reply

  14. Dawgbert
    Dec 10, 2011 @ 17:09:10

    Is Odumbo still supporting OWS after arrest, after arret, after arrest?
    I guess he has his head in the sand now. Or up his………..

    Reply

  15. Kim
    Dec 11, 2011 @ 10:25:08

    Ottawa, Canada, December 11, 2011: “Developed nations are not guilty of causing the climate change that developing nations claim they are suffering,” said Tom Harris, executive director of ICSC which is headquartered in Ottawa, Canada. “Climate changes all the time—both warming and cooling—due to natural causes and there is nothing that we can do to stop it. However, to the degree possible, and considering our economic circumstances, developed nations still have a moral obligation to devote a proportion of their foreign aid to helping the world’s most vulnerable people adapt to natural climate events.”

    http://jennifermarohasy.com/2011/12/no-climate-debt-owed-to-developing-countries-international-climate-science-coalition/

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: