Smart lady!!

I have so much respect and Admiration for Ann Barnhardt. I am going to post a few things she has written so ya’ll can share it as well.

 

I have a link to her as well – Enjoy!!

Advertisements

13 Comments (+add yours?)

  1. Kim
    Jan 14, 2012 @ 10:10:48

    Posted by Ann Barnhardt – January 13, AD 2012 8:24 PM MST
    1. The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower Federal Court decision which overturned an Oklahoma law banning Sharia law.

    Well, now at least we know that the three members of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals are traitors and seditionists against the United States and its Constitution. Great. We also know that jurists are, exactly like the broad population, stupid and too lazy or simply too deluded to do even the tiniest bit of research.

    This all goes back to the false premise that islam is a religion. I can’t overemphasize this enough. So long as Western Civilization continues to fall for the lie and stone-cold con that islam is a religion and not a totalitarian political system, then we will lose. You CAN NOT build anything, much less an entire civilization, upon a false premise. If you start from a false premise, then you will end up with a false answer that *appears* to be true. Arguing that islam is a religion is like starting a mathematical proof from the premise that 0 = 1.

    *If islam is a religion, then it is constitutionally protected. Since the core tenet of islam is the overthrowing of all secular governments, the Constitution of the United States itself demands that musloids be permitted to wage war against the United States and its Constitution with NO RESISTANCE. In other words, the Constitution demands its own destruction.

    0 = 1.

    *If islam is a religion, then the free exercise of islam is constitutionally protected as a fundamental human right. Since a core tenet of islam is the genocide and total extermination of the Jews, the constitution demands that musloid extermination of the Jews is a fundamental human right of the musloids. In other words, killing Jews is a constitutionally protected activity and human right, while the Jews have no right to exist.

    0 = 1.

    *If islam is a religion, then free exercise of islam is constitutionally protected as a fundamental human right. One of the core tenets of islam is the subjugation of non-muslims by either execution or the paying of a tax. The constitutional guarantee of equal protection under the law, confirmed by the words of the Declaration, “all men are created equal” is thus self-nullified by the First Amendment which guarantees muslims the right to free exercise which requires societal superiority of musloids and the required deprivation of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness of all non-musloids.

    0 = 1.

    Reply

    • Kim
      Jan 14, 2012 @ 10:11:27

      2. On the other hand, the SCOTUS ruled UNANIMOUSLY this week that the goverment could NOT tell religious groups who they could or could not hire as clergy. The Obama regime was trying to force the elimination of the “ministerial exception”. The endgame for the Obama regime is to force orthodox Christians to hire homosexual and/or pedophile school teachers, and to force the Catholic Church to ordain women. This has been long in the works, first explicitly betrayed by Hillary Clinton and Obama in 2009 when they started using the phrase “freedom of worship” instead of “freedom of religion”. They are ultimately going to attempt to take over all Christian churches by suing them for “discrimination” and “hate speech”. The fact that this SCOTUS decision was unanimous, meaning that Elena Kagan was on board too, is stunning. In fact, it is so stunning that it almost makes me circle back around and get nervous. Kagan is a HUGE traitor and seditionist against the U.S. via her massive support for islam and sharia. Is she laying the groundwork for protecting musloid “clergy” engaged in overt war against the United States? Hmmmm. It all bears close watching. Here’s the URL:

      http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/10525-supreme-courts-qministerial-exceptionq-ruling

      Reply

  2. Kim
    Jan 14, 2012 @ 10:11:54

    3. The MF Global trustee this week hinted strongly that the MF Global customers will not receive any more restitution of their stolen funds, and that $1.2 billion will indeed be the amount confiscated by Corzine in cahoots with the CME, CFTC, SEC, DOJ and the judiciary. Here’s the URL:

    http://www.cnbc.com/id/45973377

    Reply

  3. Kim
    Jan 14, 2012 @ 10:12:27

    4. Remember our discussion and tracking of George Soros aggressively buying up grain elevator capacity? Well, it looks like he has been very aggressive in Australia, and is indicating his strategy in the U.S.:

    URL here:

    http://stage.fw.farmonline.com.au/news/nationalrural/agribusiness-and-general/finance/broker-makes-it-easy-for-the-buyer-too/2416815.aspx

    MULTINATIONAL grain giant Gavilon once had plans to own the entire AWB trading and storage network in Australia but now is happy to outsource much of its grain accumulation activities to a third party like Agfarm.

    “We’re still assessing our options, but we’ve had very good support from Agfarm, which makes us question what resources we need to put in the bush ourselves,” said Gavilon Australia’s origination general manager, Matt Rutter.

    “Considering the time it takes to set your own people up in a new regional location and build relationships it’s better for us to leverage off the existing network that Agfarm has via its own offices and its local CRT ties.”

    “One benefit of buying through Agfarm is its people know what specific quality and stocks are available out there, and what deals will work with sellers.

    “Quite often we can target a specific region for an export parcel because of the feedback we’ve gained from Agfarm.”

    Mr Rutter felt buying through Agfarm’s grass roots-based broking service would help Gavilon build longer term credentials with rural communities, and “return something to individual businesses” in Ruralco’s independent farm services network.

    Although making earlier moves to set up base in Australia two years ago, including buying into port facilities in Brisbane and making an unsuccessful bid for AWB Ltd, Gavilon only became a serious grain buyer during the recent harvest.

    The US-based commodities trader, formed in 2008 after spinning off from agribusiness giant, ConAgra, has its Australian base in Perth and a small Melbourne office from where it has concentrated primarily on obtaining wheat, barley canola and sorghum for export to Asia.

    Its buying focus has been largely in Queensland, northern NSW, South Australia and Western Australia.

    Reply

    • Kim
      Jan 14, 2012 @ 10:12:57

      So, the Soros strategy is not to build new capacity, but to acquire existing capacity. Hmmm. And what would grease the skids in terms of buying up U.S. grain storage capacity? I dunno. How about having grain elevators’ equity stolen, and thus financially crippling them via a confiscation of customer segregated funds held with Futures Commission Merchants with the blessing and protection of the Exchange, regulatory bodies, judiciary and Department of Justice? Yes, that might “enhance the liquidity” of the U.S. grain storage market considerably. And drop the price of said grain storage capacity market, too.

      Reply

  4. Sherry
    Jan 14, 2012 @ 11:03:48

    Wait, wait, wait!
    We WANT islam to be a religion! Then it will be unconstitutional for sharia law to be in our nation-because it gives preference to a religion over the constitutions of the states and our nation. Muslims have been in our country even at the time the Constitution was put together. All this time and just NOW there is a problem? Muslims say they are talking about civil law-inheritence, business deals, etc. but, there has been no problem since the beginning of constitutional history so what is really the deal here? I believe it is as Ann has said. It puts Jews and infidels at odds for co-existance. It goes beyond the civil law of sharia to the criminal law. You can bet it is not specified in any of their paperwork. Now, if we are going to allow for sharia then we must allow for polygamy for the Mormons, child marriages, and child sacrifice for the satanists…(oh, we already allow for that via abortion).

    We are concentrating on the sharia law part of this OK ban but it also says any international law cannot supercede OK’s state laws. I think that is more of a concern since there are now UN Laws stating that no one can criticize another religion (which means islam, ofcourse, and not any other ones) even if speaking the truth. It requires nations to prosecute those who dare speak up against islam’s crime-ridden tenets. Ms. Clinton signed on to it in April of last year, iirc.

    Reply

  5. Sherry
    Jan 14, 2012 @ 11:11:41

    Just a FYI~ Mormons went to the Supreme Court concerning the ability to marry multiple wives because its part of their religion and the SC smacked it down. It is stated that NO religious practice can supersede the U.S. Constitution. If you are a muslim and you commit an honor killing expect to be prosecuted for it. No muslim can take a child bride-if caught, they will be facing pedophilia charges.

    Reply

  6. Kim
    Jan 14, 2012 @ 11:18:25

    We live in a secularized world of nation states in which traditional religion, especially Christianity, is unwelcome. Rooted in the “Enlightenment,” this view supports a secularized and authoritarian public square enforced by government and that progress requires forcing religion ever backward into remote corners of society. In short, America has become a secular theocracy with a civic religion of national politics (nationalism) occupying the public realm in which government has replaced God.

    http://faustasblog.com/?p=28566

    Reply

  7. Sherry
    Jan 14, 2012 @ 13:12:27

    http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/01/germany-attempts-to-stamp-out-truth-telling-regarding-islam-and-jihad.html

    Boston Tea party’s comment:

    The reason totalitarians repress free speech , I think, is not because it’s necessarily inherent in their ideology, nor because they want to do so as an end in itself. The reason they repress free speech is because they’ve wedded themselves (and their power and position) to a shallow, brittle, illogical ideology that absolutely cannot survive in an arena of open, honest debate. This is exactly where the multiculturalist elites are right now—and in fact, this is something that the multiculturalism and Islam share, and that’s largely why they’re united in their desire to restrict free speech.

    Reply

  8. Kim
    Jan 14, 2012 @ 13:19:44

    Boston is smart

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: