Obama’s Bodyguard

It is truly amazing to me how completely blind some people are when it comes to obama. Blind and stupid to stand there an lie and lie and lie like she does.

Amazing

Advertisements

22 Comments (+add yours?)

  1. Kim
    Jan 30, 2012 @ 13:03:07

    Party chairs are usually backstage fundraisers, but Wasserman Schultz is a nonstop broadcaster for Team Obama, sometimes delivering her points in robotic fashion. Her situation can be awkward, as the president’s survival may depend on running against her fellow lawmakers, who resent being cast as part of a dysfunctional body. She tries to wish that away, saying: “I don’t think the president means Democrats when he’s criticizing Congress.” Many Democrats are also steamed at the lack of attention they get from Obama. “I’ve had zero personal contact,” says California Rep. Dennis Cardoza, who was told by one White House official that Obama looks “pained” when prodded to socialize with lawmakers. Former Tennessee congressman John Tanner says Obama summoned him only to solicit his vote, and he offers some advice: “Call on people when you don’t ask them for something.”

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/01/29/rep-debbie-wasserman-schultz-obama-s-bodyguard.html

    Reply

  2. Kim
    Jan 30, 2012 @ 13:20:39

    “The president isn’t leading. The president isn’t truthful with the American people about what kind of fiscal train wreck is coming, we’re going to be. And we’ll pass budgets to show the country exactly how we propose to fix the problem. You know the thing that is frustrating about this, Chris, is there is an emerging bipartisan census on fixing these big problems. There are Democrats who do agree with us on how to do tax reform. Get the loopholes out, lower the rates. We’re getting a bipartisan consensus on Medicare reform. The problem is the president and his party leader are out on the left standing on the sidelines looking in. So what we clearly need is a new White House and a new Senate and then we can realize this emerging bipartisan consensus on how to fix these problems,” Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) said on “FOX News Sunday” this morning.

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/01/29/paul_ryan_the_president_isnt_leading_on_upcoming_fiscal_train_wreck.html#.TybsONwmh04.facebook

    Reply

  3. Sherry
    Jan 30, 2012 @ 14:28:10

    This reminds me of the proverb: The wicked flee when no one is persuing him.
    Obama fears criticism by anyone, methinks. Hobknobbing with fellow Dems puts him in the spotlight for hearing their concerns about his performance. Come to think of it, much of what Obama is doing to take away freedoms isn’t all that palatable to Dems because it affects them, too.

    Reply

    • Kim
      Jan 30, 2012 @ 14:44:31

      They have chores for him to do and he doesn’t want to not only that, if people get too close to him they can actually see for themselves what a clusterfuk he really is

      Reply

  4. Sherry
    Jan 30, 2012 @ 14:28:53

    …click the damn box!… 😡

    Reply

  5. Kim
    Jan 30, 2012 @ 14:43:14

    TFF!!!

    Reply

  6. Kim
    Jan 30, 2012 @ 15:17:25

    This week, Retired ASAR LTC William F. Reade filed an official ballot challenge with election officials, contending that Barack Obama is ineligible to appear on the Massachusetts ballot. Reade’s challenge is well researched and filled with numerous legal citations to back his case.

    http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/four-new-states-join-georgia-in-challenging-obamas-eligibility-for-the-ballot-and-one-of-them-is/question-2422417/

    Reply

  7. Kim
    Jan 30, 2012 @ 15:43:35

    How convenient. Racial code words just happen to entail every conservative criticism of socialistic programs.

    You cannot say Entitlement Society because that somehow is racist. Never mind that white people are a plurality of the people on welfare. It is racist because, well, Juan Williams said it is. End of discussion.

    And we cannot talk about Work Ethic because apparently Juan Williams thinks only white people have one. I will have to memo Herman Cain, Bill Cosby and Spike Lee on that. They worked their butts off for nothing.

    http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/archives/50670

    Reply

  8. Kim
    Feb 01, 2012 @ 18:32:28

    On Tuesday MSNBC’s “Hardball” host Chris Matthews said that the level of hatred directed against President Barack Obama is greater than it was against any other president, including George W. Bush.

    “There is a real level of national hatred of the president [Obama] that I hadn’t seen before, certainly not under Clinton, or under Dubya,” Matthews said on WMAL’s “Morning Majority” broadcast. “The hatred, the Hitler mustaches — I hadn’t seen that before.” (RELATED: Chris Matthews: I never saw left-wingers’ hate-speech signs targeting President Bush [AUDIO])

    The Daily Caller rounded up photos from anti-Bush rallies during his two terms in the White House and found some of the worst images from protests around the country.

    http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/31/top-10-most-vile-anti-bush-signs-slideshow/

    Reply

  9. Kim
    Feb 02, 2012 @ 08:15:16

    Reply

  10. Kim
    Feb 02, 2012 @ 08:34:09

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    Nobel Peace Prize officials were facing a formal inquiry over accusations they have drifted away from the prize’s original selection criteria by choosing such winners as President Barack Obama, as the nomination deadline for the 2012 awards closed Wednesday.

    The investigation comes after persistent complaints by a Norwegian peace researcher that the original purpose of the prize was to diminish the role of military power in international relations.

    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obamas-nobel-peace-prize-win-leads-to-formal-investigation-of-award/

    Reply

  11. Kim
    Feb 02, 2012 @ 08:41:58

    Interesting

    Among them is a managing director of Bain Capital, the firm Mitt Romney founded, and whose name Obama and Newt Gingrich have sought to make synonymous with vicious layoffs and predatory financial engineering.

    Jonathan Lavine, the managing director at Bain, raised more than $100,000 for Obama, according to the campaign.

    http://weaselzippers.us/2012/02/01/team-obama-confirms-bain-director-one-of-its-top-campaign-bundlers/

    Reply

  12. Kim
    Feb 02, 2012 @ 09:11:56

    The family of murdered Border Patrol agent Brian Terry has filed a $25 million wrongful death claim against the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives claiming Terry was killed with AK-47s that were knowingly sold under the Fast and Furious gunrunning probe to a straw purchaser for drug cartels.

    http://nation.foxnews.com/fast-and-furious/2012/02/02/family-murdered-border-patrol-agent-files-25m-claim-against-atf

    Reply

  13. Kim
    Feb 02, 2012 @ 09:12:51

    Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) said Tuesday that the Democratic Party would “effectively” be “put out of business,” if Congress were to pass a balanced budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

    “They can’t work with us on balancing the budget,” DeMint said. “Their whole platform is based on more promises from government and more government spending.

    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/sen-demint-balanced-budget-amendment-would-effectively-put-democratic-party-out

    Reply

  14. Kim
    Feb 02, 2012 @ 10:09:34

    In President Obama’s first budget, entitled (with no apparent sense of irony) “A New Era of Responsibility,” he projected that the federal budget deficit in 2012 would be a rather hefty $581 billion (see summary table S-1). Fast-forwarding three years, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) now projects that it will instead be $1.079 trillion, meaning that, if the CBO is right, Obama was wrong by $498,000,000,000. To put that into perspective, that roughly half-trillion dollar margin of error is more than Obama allocated is this year’s budget for Medicare (see table S-3). Medicare could magically have become free for 2012, and the deficit would still have exceeded Obama’s earlier estimate.
    tws-F-obama smile.07

    Deficit spending under Obama has truly been historic. An editorial in the Wall Street Journal rightly observes that “Mr. Obama has the worst fiscal record of any President in modern times. No one else is even close.” However, even this is somewhat generous. When you factor in the context — we’re not currently fighting the Civil War, World War I, or World War II, which are the only other times that our deficits have exceeded 6.0 percent of GDP (as they have every year under Obama) — the deficits on Obama’s watch are by far the most profligate in all of American history.

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-underestimates-2012-deficit-about-half-trillion-dollars_620863.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

    Reply

  15. Kim
    Feb 02, 2012 @ 10:59:57

    Reply

  16. Kim
    Feb 02, 2012 @ 11:44:46

    I’m unconvinced of the reality of the alleged voracious Obama intellect. Evidence points to an incurious, intellectually lazy man who’s content to let others handle the “details” (that is, everything) and sign off at the end, when it suits him. This not only saves him time for other pursuits but allows him to keep his hands clean. Whether he possesses the raw materials of genius is beside the point. It may seem strange to call a man who’s risen to the highest office in the world an underachiever but I think the case can be made that he hasn’t been all that keen on what a parent or teacher might call “applying himself.”

    http://www.punditandpundette.com/2012/02/box-checker-in-chief.html

    Reply

    • Kim
      Feb 02, 2012 @ 11:45:14

      We’ve remarked before on Obama’s curious lack of accomplishment. The late Dean Barnett wrote about this with prescience in September of 2008:

      While it has become almost a cliché on the right to belittle Obama as a talker rather than a doer, his résumé suggests just that. Obama does have the requisite brain power to be president; it’s unlikely that the intellectual demands of the job would overwhelm him. But his past work experience is unnerving. Obama had ample talent to excel at all the other positions he has held, and yet he accomplished little at each. So what would he do as president? Would his efforts in the Oval Office be as indifferent and irresolute as they’ve been at every other stop along his professional path?

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: